FollowCheck 中文

Out-of-Sample Testing: Why Last Month's Best Traders Often Stop Winning

A dense track record on the left, then a thinner, uncertain continuation on the right.

Any list of “best traders” is picked with hindsight. Some of those traders are skilled; many were lucky in a short window. A copier who starts after they top a list gets their future, not their past.

What out-of-sample means here

On every copyability board, each trader is ranked using one period. The out-of-sample ROI column then shows the simulated follower ROI, at the same delay, in the following window (7 or 14 days) — data the ranking never saw. If rankings carry real information, high-ranked traders should keep doing better than low-ranked ones out of sample.

A timeline: the ranking period ends when the board is published; the following 7 or 14 days are the out-of-sample test window.Board publishedRanking periodTest windowTraders ranked by returns keptNext 7 or 14 days,unseen by the ranking
The out-of-sample column only uses trades from after the ranking was fixed.

How to read it

Why we don’t just rank by PnL

Ranking by PnL selects for size and luck, and says nothing about whether a copier could follow in time. Our boards rank by returns kept after delay, and the out-of-sample column tests whether that ranking holds up.

Past results don’t predict future results. Related: methodology.

FollowCheck backtests are simulations from historical on-chain fills. Past results don't predict future results. Not investment advice.